H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Haroon Ismail vs Sandy Mayer H2H: 0-1

Sandy Mayer holds a 1–0 lead over Haroon Ismail in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandy Mayer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sandy Mayer won the 1982 Wimbledon round of 128 7-5 6-2 6-3.

ZIM Age 71 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandy Mayer #9 7-5 6-2 6-3 Haroon Ismail Match data Jun 23, 1982* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Haroon Ismail #1,144 #87 0 1,611 20 46 30.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandy Mayer #508 #7 0 2,080 371 205 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Haroon Ismail Sandy Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1970 1–2 33.3% 1,483 0 0
19 1971 1–4 20.0% 1,455 0 0
20 1972 13–8 61.9% 1,650 0 0
21 1973 30–13 69.8% #134 1,813 0 2
22 1974 29–10 74.4% #55 1,875 0 5
23 1978 0–1 0.0% #130 1,490 0 0 1975 47–23 67.1% #28 1,939 0 5
24 1979 4–14 22.2% #197 1,474 0 0 1976 13–15 46.4% #75 1,877 0 5
25 1980 8–9 47.1% #100 1,543 0 0 1977 39–14 73.6% #16 1,995 0 8
26 1981 5–7 41.7% #99 1,589 0 0 1978 41–20 67.2% #17 1,936 0 9
27 1982 3–14 17.6% #99 1,492 0 0 1979 15–12 55.6% #44 1,902 0 9
28 1983 0–1 0.0% #187 1,482 0 0 1980 17–18 48.6% #51 1,835 0 9
29 1981 42–16 72.4% #14 2,048 0 10
30 1982 38–19 66.7% #16 1,912 0 11
31 1983 33–17 66.0% #18 1,935 0 12
32 1984 10–11 47.6% #117 1,806 0 12
33 1985 2–3 40.0% #309 1,795 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Haroon Ismail Sandy Mayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1970 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1971 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1973 14 6 20 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1974 6 2 8 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3%
23 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 17 7 24 70.8% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 21 7 28 75.0%
24 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
25 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1977 15 5 20 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 21 8 29 72.4%
26 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 26 13 39 66.7%
27 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1981 22 8 30 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
30 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5%
31 1983 16 8 24 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
32 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 3 12 15 20.0% 13 24 37 35.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 129 66 195 66.2% 46 31 77 59.7% 57 33 90 63.3% 139 75 214 65.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Haroon Ismail Sandy Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1970 1484 98.5 +6 37.5% -0.87 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.18
19 1971 1456 95.6 +66 30.8% -2.46 0–1 1–0 +0.38
20 1972 1651 127.7 -77 -36 -10 61.3% +0.85 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) +1.83
21 1973 1813 130.2 -73 -58 -95 69.2% +1.07 6–3 (67%) 8–2 (80%) +3.28
22 1974 1875 138.1 +51 -128 68.5% +1.21 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) +3.00
23 1978 1491 102.0 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 +0.03 1975 1939 149.0 +83 -226 -171 63.9% +1.01 8–7 (53%) 10–7 (59%) -0.37
24 1979 1474 113.3 +123 -9 +6 27.8% -1.42 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +0.36 1976 1877 146.9 +59 -136 49.2% -0.11 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) -4.01
25 1980 1543 119.3 +37 +3 46.2% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) +1.91 1977 1996 152.6 +51 -241 68.9% +1.40 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) +0.23
26 1981 1589 128.3 +28 40.0% -0.51 2–1 (67%) 0–2 -0.08 1978 1936 156.1 +10 -230 -32 63.8% +0.98 12–11 (52%) 14–10 (58%) -2.55
27 1982 1492 109.5 +19 +46 23.1% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -0.39 1979 1902 143.7 -28 -144 +61 53.4% +0.10 7–4 (64%) 10–5 (67%) -3.21
28 1983 1482 97.2 0.0% -4.00 +0.04 1980 1835 151.0 +59 +50 48.2% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 6–4 (60%) -4.38
29 1981 2049 165.1 +73 -302 -159 65.4% +1.15 13–4 (76%) 10–4 (71%) -5.49
30 1982 1912 154.4 +102 -109 -72 63.2% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–6 (57%) -1.06
31 1983 1936 155.1 +1 -53 -12 61.2% +0.81 14–8 (64%) 10–8 (56%) -2.69
32 1984 1806 122.4 +46 +18 51.7% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) -0.21
33 1985 1795 128.2 +51 50.0% +0.50 0–2 0–2 -1.00
Career 1612 120.8 +70 +22 +6 33.8% -1.12 6–7 (46%) 5–7 (42%) 100.7 +2.88 2081 155.8 +44 -112 -55 61.6% +0.79 108–78 (58%) 99–67 (60%) 107.5 -2.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.