H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Heinz Gunthardt vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 1-2
Mark Edmondson holds a 2–1 lead over Heinz Gunthardt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heinz Gunthardt won the 1982 Munich-2 Wct third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 67
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1982* | Munich-2 Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Heinz Gunthardt | 6-3 7-6 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1981* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Mark Edmondson | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Heinz Gunthardt | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1980* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mark Edmondson | 6-3 7-6 | Heinz Gunthardt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heinz Gunthardt | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,966 | 225 | 189 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heinz Gunthardt | Mark Edmondson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #38 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 |
| 23 | 1982 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 1983 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 1984 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #36 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #251 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,663 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 |