H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Heinz Gunthardt vs Raymond Moore H2H: 3-1
Heinz Gunthardt holds a 3–1 lead over Raymond Moore in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Heinz Gunthardt leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heinz Gunthardt won the 1980 Johannesburg fourth round 5-7 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 67
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 1980* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Heinz Gunthardt | 5-7 6-2 7-5 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1980* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Heinz Gunthardt | 6-4 6-0 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1977* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Heinz Gunthardt | 7-6 6-4 | Raymond Moore | Match data |
| Nov 18, 1976* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raymond Moore | 7-6 7-5 | Heinz Gunthardt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heinz Gunthardt | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,966 | 225 | 189 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Raymond Moore | #503 | #32 | 0 | 1,892 | 357 | 376 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heinz Gunthardt | Raymond Moore | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 35–23 | 60.3% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #38 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 32–39 | 45.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 17–28 | 37.8% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #36 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 36–36 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #251 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,663 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #39 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 35–30 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #138 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #99 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #112 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #100 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |