H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Hendrik Dreekmann vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 0-5

Cedric Pioline holds a 5–0 lead over Hendrik Dreekmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hendrik Dreekmann
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 14, 1998* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Carpet Cedric Pioline #20 4-6 6-3 7-5 Hendrik Dreekmann #98 Match data
Apr 24, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #29 6-3 6-3 Hendrik Dreekmann #53 Match data
Feb 17, 1996* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Cedric Pioline #44 6-3 3-6 6-2 Hendrik Dreekmann #115 Match data
Jan 13, 1995* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Cedric Pioline #51 6-2 6-3 Hendrik Dreekmann #63 Match data
Sep 15, 1994* Bordeaux ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #26 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 7-5 Hendrik Dreekmann #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Hendrik Dreekmann #1,171 #39 1,013 1,786 95 116 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hendrik Dreekmann Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–5 28.6% #166 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1994 15–22 40.5% #64 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 14–17 45.2% #93 1,657 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1996 22–19 53.7% #49 1,755 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1997 15–20 42.9% #91 1,628 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1998 16–16 50.0% #87 1,701 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1999 11–15 42.3% #129 1,626 0 0 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2002 0–1 0.0% #880 1,622 0 0 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2003 0–1 0.0% #888 1,614 0 0 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5