H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Hendrik Dreekmann vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-1
Hendrik Dreekmann holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hendrik Dreekmann leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hendrik Dreekmann won the 1999 Hong Kong quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1999* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hendrik Dreekmann | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1997* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Richard Krajicek | 6-0 6-3 | Hendrik Dreekmann | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1996* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hendrik Dreekmann | 7-6(5) 7-6(7) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hendrik Dreekmann | #1,171 | #39 | 1,013 | 1,786 | 95 | 116 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hendrik Dreekmann | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #64 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #93 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1996 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1997 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1999 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #129 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #880 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #888 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |