H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Hendrik Dreekmann vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 1-3

Thomas Johansson holds a 3–1 lead over Hendrik Dreekmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 1998 US Open round of 64 2-6 7-5 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hendrik Dreekmann
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Johansson #33 2-6 7-5 6-2 6-3 Hendrik Dreekmann #95 Match data Sep 4, 1998* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Thomas Johansson #50 3-6 6-1 6-4 Hendrik Dreekmann #101 Match data Jun 13, 1998* QF Halle Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Thomas Johansson #80 2-6 6-3 6-1 Hendrik Dreekmann #39 Match data Oct 12, 1996* QF China Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Hendrik Dreekmann #54 7-6(1) 6-2 4-6 6-1 Thomas Johansson #85 Match data Aug 30, 1996* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hendrik Dreekmann #1,171 #39 1,013 1,788 95 116 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hendrik Dreekmann Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–5 28.6% #166 1,506 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0
19 1994 15–22 40.5% #64 1,617 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1995 14–17 45.2% #93 1,658 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0
21 1996 22–19 53.7% #49 1,756 0 0 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1997 15–20 42.9% #91 1,629 0 0 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2
23 1998 16–16 50.0% #87 1,701 0 0 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2
24 1999 11–15 42.3% #129 1,637 0 0 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4
26 — — — — — — — 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2002 0–1 0.0% #880 1,632 0 0 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7
28 2003 0–1 0.0% #888 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8
30 — — — — — — — 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 — — — — — — — 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9
32 — — — — — — — 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9
33 — — — — — — — 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hendrik Dreekmann Thomas Johansson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1996 16 8 24 66.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6%
22 1997 7 6 13 53.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
23 1998 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 49 43 92 53.3% 21 34 55 38.2% 11 19 30 36.7% 14 20 34 41.2% — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hendrik Dreekmann Thomas Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1993 1506 112.3 +0.25 -1.05 0.876 48.4% -8 — +113 36.8% -0.42 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -0.10 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12
19 1994 1617 132.2 -1.98 -0.24 0.935 48.5% -12 -11 -48 46.7% -0.48 6–11 (35%) 8–7 (53%) 101.7 -0.37 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29
20 1995 1659 137.2 +1.00 -0.01 1.022 50.1% +7 -35 -108 47.6% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 101.4 -0.93 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10
21 1996 1757 145.6 +0.64 +0.24 0.981 49.8% +44 -147 -205 54.3% -0.04 4–8 (33%) 14–3 (82%) 104.8 -1.87 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) 103.6 +0.21
22 1997 1630 130.2 -1.06 -1.46 0.892 48.4% +89 -33 -2 43.2% -0.59 6–5 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 101.5 -0.39 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) 91.8 +2.54
23 1998 1702 133.6 +0.64 -0.31 0.939 49.1% +8 -77 -65 49.4% -0.11 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -1.13 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) 98.8 -1.44
24 1999 1637 129.2 -2.27 -0.71 0.885 47.7% +67 -24 -42 43.3% -0.48 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 -1.19 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) 99.5 +1.29
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) 100.3 -0.07
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) 102.6 -2.47
27 2002 1633 103.0 +1.77 +3.12 0.678 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.36 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) 97.6 -0.26
28 2003 1625 97.0 +1.94 -0.32 0.397 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 104.6 -2.69
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 103.3 +0.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) 92.2 +0.60
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) 101.2 -2.55
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 98.1 -1.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.4 -0.40 -0.37 0.937 48.9% +29 -50 -47 47.2% -0.31 33–44 (43%) 43–31 (58%) 107.2 -3.15 — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.