H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Henri Leconte vs Brian Gottfried H2H: 0-2
Brian Gottfried holds a 2–0 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brian Gottfried leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brian Gottfried won the 1982 Vienna semifinal 6-2 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1982* | Vienna | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Brian Gottfried | 6-2 6-7 6-4 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1982* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Brian Gottfried | 6-3 7-5 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Brian Gottfried | #431 | #3 | 0 | 2,237 | 695 | 322 | 68.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | Brian Gottfried | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 52–33 | 61.2% | #21 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 56–33 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,946 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 70–31 | 69.3% | #23 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 68–29 | 70.1% | #10 | 2,110 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 107–22 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 72–24 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,999 | 0 | 15 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 54–23 | 70.1% | #16 | 1,978 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,997 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #18 | 1,945 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #22 | 1,948 | 0 | 24 |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 25 |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #90 | 1,723 | 0 | 25 |