H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Henri Leconte vs Cassio Motta H2H: 2-0
Henri Leconte holds a 2–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1986 Roland Garros third round 1-6 3-6 7-6 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Henri Leconte | 1-6 3-6 7-6 6-0 6-0 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1984* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Henri Leconte | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |