H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Henri Leconte vs David Rikl H2H: 0-2
David Rikl holds a 2–0 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Rikl leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1996 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-7(6) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1996* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | David Rikl | 6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1995* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | David Rikl | 6-2 6-4 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |