H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Henri Leconte vs David Rikl H2H: 0-2

David Rikl holds a 2–0 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Rikl leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1996 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 6-2 6-7(6) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Henri Leconte
FRA Age 63 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
David Rikl
CZE Age 55 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Rikl #99 6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 Henri Leconte #322 Match data Apr 24, 1996* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
David Rikl #149 6-2 6-4 Henri Leconte #103 Match data Apr 26, 1995* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Henri Leconte #1,355 #5 948 2,064 346 244 58.6% 0 0 0 0 9 9
David Rikl #852 #41 809 1,687 53 92 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Henri Leconte David Rikl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–4 0.0% #440 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1982 31–21 59.6% #29 1,852 0 1 1989 1–1 50.0% #400 1,503 0 0
19 1983 35–23 60.3% #30 1,828 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #313 1,491 0 0
20 1984 26–18 59.1% #27 1,867 0 2 1991 1–3 25.0% #163 1,474 0 0
21 1985 44–21 67.7% #16 1,933 0 4 1992 5–7 41.7% #151 1,502 0 0
22 1986 38–14 73.1% #6 1,973 0 6 1993 7–13 35.0% #95 1,531 0 0
23 1987 23–16 59.0% #21 1,844 0 6 1994 19–28 40.4% #80 1,536 0 0
24 1988 48–20 70.6% #9 1,925 0 8 1995 7–13 35.0% #83 1,534 0 0
25 1989 10–11 47.6% #115 1,792 0 8 1996 10–21 32.3% #150 1,528 0 0
26 1990 25–17 59.5% #30 1,797 0 8 1997 3–4 42.9% #173 1,578 0 0
27 1991 8–12 40.0% #161 1,717 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1992 18–16 52.9% #61 1,820 0 8 1999 0–1 0.0% #868 1,564 0 0
29 1993 13–11 54.2% #101 1,840 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1994 16–16 50.0% #94 1,741 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1995 8–14 36.4% #134 1,635 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1996 0–4 0.0% #1001 1,560 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Henri Leconte David Rikl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 19 7 26 73.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 14 8 22 63.6% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 8 6 14 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 10 7 17 58.8% 19 7 26 73.1% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 19 4 23 82.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1994 7 14 21 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 24 7 31 77.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1995 0 4 4 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 7 15 22 31.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 3 2 5 60.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 85 64 149 57.0% 146 95 241 60.6% 56 29 85 65.9% 59 56 115 51.3% — 13 32 45 28.9% 32 46 78 41.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 120/136 of Henri Leconte's and 129/142 of David Rikl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Henri Leconte David Rikl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 2/4 2.0 4.5 58.4% 69.4% 48.3% 66.3% 33.3% 60.9% 31.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 11/12 1.5 3.7 55.8% 61.4% 43.4% 57.2% 40.8% 53.2% 40.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 18/20 1.8 3.6 56.0% 64.5% 45.1% 51.7% 47.0% 56.1% 36.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 43/47 2.8 3.8 56.8% 64.9% 49.0% 55.1% 40.8% 58.2% 35.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 20/20 3.8 4.4 53.3% 67.9% 49.0% 55.8% 44.4% 59.4% 39.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 27/31 2.1 3.3 58.8% 64.2% 45.1% 56.8% 40.0% 56.5% 36.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 7/7 5.4 5.9 55.2% 67.9% 44.5% 60.4% 56.0% 57.4% 39.2%
27 1991 19/20 7.2 5.3 46.5% 74.1% 50.9% 60.1% 48.7% 61.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 27/34 7.6 3.7 52.3% 77.5% 52.8% 65.7% 45.7% 65.7% 40.2% 1999 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.4% 82.1% 50.0% 33.3% 66.7% 67.1% 34.9%
29 1993 21/24 5.8 5.6 50.8% 73.6% 49.4% 62.4% 39.5% 61.8% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 29/32 5.4 4.2 48.1% 74.7% 51.4% 58.2% 43.0% 62.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 21/22 5.0 4.6 50.4% 67.4% 47.9% 51.5% 36.6% 57.8% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 3/4 3.3 5.3 40.9% 67.5% 44.9% 52.1% 25.0% 53.7% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 120/590 6.1 4.6 49.5% 73.6% 50.5% 59.6% 42.3% 62.0% 38.1% — 129/145 2.7 3.9 56.4% 65.2% 46.9% 55.6% 43.0% 57.4% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Henri Leconte David Rikl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1462 107.0 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1481 112.5 — — — — — — +123 40.7% -0.74 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1853 153.1 — — — — +3 -263 -281 53.3% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.69 1989 1504 102.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — +0.28
19 1983 1829 160.3 — — — — +21 -60 — 57.7% +0.77 12–9 (57%) 4–9 (31%) — -5.74 1990 1492 101.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
20 1984 1867 156.9 — — — — +15 -26 — 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.73 1991 1474 99.3 -0.87 -1.37 0.804 47.8% +55 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.56
21 1985 1934 153.7 — — — — -90 -6 -68 65.9% +1.15 9–7 (56%) 11–15 (42%) — -0.38 1992 1503 110.9 -3.14 -0.80 0.856 47.2% — +80 — 41.4% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.71
22 1986 1973 155.3 — — — — -103 +24 -3 71.7% +1.39 6–5 (55%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.49 1993 1532 121.2 -2.57 -0.92 0.837 46.7% -53 +80 — 37.0% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.11
23 1987 1844 139.2 — — — — +4 +40 +96 58.2% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 13–10 (57%) — +1.37 1994 1536 126.2 -2.08 -2.48 0.847 47.1% -44 +135 — 38.9% -0.83 5–8 (38%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.69
24 1988 1925 151.1 — — — — -40 +57 -10 63.2% +0.85 14–1 (93%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.80 1995 1534 123.3 -1.30 -0.19 0.959 49.3% -48 +102 — 42.0% -0.48 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.78
25 1989 1792 131.0 — — — — -11 +138 — 46.9% -0.02 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.39 1996 1529 123.0 -3.53 -0.97 0.843 46.6% -13 +41 — 39.0% -0.89 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.07
26 1990 1797 147.6 — — — — -76 +181 +71 61.2% +0.68 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.20 1997 1578 115.2 -1.18 +1.34 0.921 48.9% -56 — +29 50.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.27
27 1991 1717 126.0 +1.97 -1.02 1.023 50.6% -76 +146 +147 51.0% +0.43 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1821 151.3 +3.52 +2.24 1.171 52.9% -59 -12 +50 58.9% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.65 1999 1565 98.3 -0.24 +1.75 1.063 50.0% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.03
29 1993 1841 136.9 +1.37 -0.47 0.935 48.7% -131 -60 +120 51.5% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–3 (63%) — -3.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1742 142.8 +1.00 +2.00 1.059 51.0% -13 -31 +182 54.1% +0.50 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1636 122.3 -2.33 -1.40 0.837 46.9% +104 +2 +161 38.5% -0.85 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1561 92.6 -3.49 -2.03 0.714 43.1% — — — 10.0% -3.10 0–1 1–0 — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 155.4 +1.09 +0.45 1.001 50.0% -27 +11 +40 58.0% +0.61 103–86 (54%) 107–100 (52%) 101.5 -3.37 — 1687 125.9 -2.34 -1.19 0.867 47.4% -37 +85 +29 39.5% -0.81 15–30 (33%) 19–25 (43%) 91.8 +2.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.