H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Henri Leconte vs Eric Jelen H2H: 2-0
Henri Leconte holds a 2–0 lead over Eric Jelen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1989 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 4-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1989* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Henri Leconte | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Eric Jelen | Match data |
| May 15, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Henri Leconte | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Eric Jelen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Eric Jelen | #1,153 | #23 | 575 | 1,805 | 124 | 127 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | Eric Jelen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #31 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #76 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #47 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #118 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |