H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Henri Leconte vs Gene Mayer H2H: 1-2
Gene Mayer holds a 2–1 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gene Mayer leads 2–0 on carpet, while Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1984 Stuttgart Outdoor final 7-6 6-0 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1984* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Henri Leconte | 7-6 6-0 1-6 6-1 | Gene Mayer | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1984* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Gene Mayer | 6-4 6-3 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1983* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Gene Mayer | 6-4 6-2 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Gene Mayer | #976 | #4 | 6 | 2,198 | 311 | 159 | 66.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | Gene Mayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #142 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,979 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 71–16 | 81.6% | #5 | 2,139 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,069 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #10 | 1,964 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 14 |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,863 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,841 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |