H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Henri Leconte vs Hans Schwaier H2H: 4-0
Henri Leconte holds a 4–0 lead over Hans Schwaier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Henri Leconte leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1988 Hamburg fourth round 7-5 2-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1988* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Henri Leconte | 7-5 2-6 7-6 | Hans Schwaier | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Henri Leconte | 6-2 6-2 6-1 | Hans Schwaier | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1985* | Nice | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Henri Leconte | 7-5 6-4 | Hans Schwaier | Match data |
| Jul 23, 1983* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Henri Leconte | 6-2 6-1 | Hans Schwaier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Hans Schwaier | #528 | #38 | 92 | 1,748 | 57 | 84 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | Hans Schwaier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #434 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #47 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #158 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #170 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #212 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |