H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Henri Leconte vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 2-2
Henri Leconte and Jonathan Canter are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1987 Cincinnati second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1987* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jonathan Canter | 6-3 7-5 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1987* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Henri Leconte | 6-7 6-1 6-4 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1986* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jonathan Canter | 6-4 6-4 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Dec 13, 1985* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Henri Leconte | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |