H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Henri Leconte vs Kim Warwick H2H: 0-1

Kim Warwick holds a 1–0 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1980 South African Open round of 32 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Henri Leconte
FRA Age 63 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #42 6-1 7-5 Henri Leconte Match data Nov 28, 1980* R32 South African Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Henri Leconte #1,355 #5 948 2,064 346 244 58.6% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Henri Leconte Kim Warwick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–4 0.0% #440 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,481 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
18 1982 31–21 59.6% #29 1,852 0 1 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0
19 1983 35–23 60.3% #30 1,828 0 1 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0
20 1984 26–18 59.1% #27 1,867 0 2 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0
21 1985 44–21 67.7% #16 1,933 0 4 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0
22 1986 38–14 73.1% #6 1,973 0 6 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0
23 1987 23–16 59.0% #21 1,844 0 6 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0
24 1988 48–20 70.6% #9 1,925 0 8 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1
25 1989 10–11 47.6% #115 1,792 0 8 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1
26 1990 25–17 59.5% #30 1,797 0 8 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1
27 1991 8–12 40.0% #161 1,717 0 8 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2
28 1992 18–16 52.9% #61 1,820 0 8 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3
29 1993 13–11 54.2% #101 1,840 0 9 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3
30 1994 16–16 50.0% #94 1,741 0 9 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3
31 1995 8–14 36.4% #134 1,635 0 9 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3
32 1996 0–4 0.0% #1001 1,560 0 9 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Henri Leconte Kim Warwick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1982 19 7 26 73.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
19 1983 14 8 22 63.6% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
20 1984 8 6 14 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — —
21 1985 10 7 17 58.8% 19 7 26 73.1% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 19 4 23 82.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9%
23 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9%
24 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 24 7 31 77.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2%
25 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
28 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 1994 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 1995 3 2 5 60.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 85 64 149 57.0% 146 95 241 60.6% 56 29 85 65.9% 59 56 115 51.3% — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Henri Leconte Kim Warwick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1462 107.0 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1481 112.5 — — — — — — +123 40.7% -0.74 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.37 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
18 1982 1853 153.1 — — — — +3 -263 -281 53.3% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.69 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42
19 1983 1829 160.3 — — — — +21 -60 — 57.7% +0.77 12–9 (57%) 4–9 (31%) — -5.74 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86
20 1984 1867 156.9 — — — — +15 -26 — 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.73 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23
21 1985 1934 153.7 — — — — -90 -6 -68 65.9% +1.15 9–7 (56%) 11–15 (42%) — -0.38 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
22 1986 1973 155.3 — — — — -103 +24 -3 71.7% +1.39 6–5 (55%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.49 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10
23 1987 1844 139.2 — — — — +4 +40 +96 58.2% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 13–10 (57%) — +1.37 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45
24 1988 1925 151.1 — — — — -40 +57 -10 63.2% +0.85 14–1 (93%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.80 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01
25 1989 1792 131.0 — — — — -11 +138 — 46.9% -0.02 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.39 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00
26 1990 1797 147.6 — — — — -76 +181 +71 61.2% +0.68 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.20 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65
27 1991 1717 126.0 +1.97 -1.02 1.023 50.6% -76 +146 +147 51.0% +0.43 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.35 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20
28 1992 1821 151.3 +3.52 +2.24 1.171 52.9% -59 -12 +50 58.9% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.65 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21
29 1993 1841 136.9 +1.37 -0.47 0.935 48.7% -131 -60 +120 51.5% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–3 (63%) — -3.12 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26
30 1994 1742 142.8 +1.00 +2.00 1.059 51.0% -13 -31 +182 54.1% +0.50 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.94 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50
31 1995 1636 122.3 -2.33 -1.40 0.837 46.9% +104 +2 +161 38.5% -0.85 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — -1.19 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49
32 1996 1561 92.6 -3.49 -2.03 0.714 43.1% — — — 10.0% -3.10 0–1 1–0 — +0.47 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23
Career — 2064 155.4 +1.09 +0.45 1.001 50.0% -27 +11 +40 58.0% +0.61 103–86 (54%) 107–100 (52%) 101.5 -3.37 — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.