H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Henri Leconte vs Kim Warwick H2H: 0-1
Kim Warwick holds a 1–0 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1980 Johannesburg third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 1980* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kim Warwick | 6-1 7-5 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | Kim Warwick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |