H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Henri Leconte vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 2-0
Henri Leconte holds a 2–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1986 Geneva quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1986* | Geneva | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Henri Leconte | 6-4 6-3 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1982* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Henri Leconte | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Leconte | Martin Wostenholme | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |