Henrik Sundstrom
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 13, 1985 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 5 | 3 | 8 | Jun 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Andres Gomez | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 25, 1986 | H2H |
| Alberto Tous | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jul 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Damir Keretic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 11, 1986 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Henrik Sundstrom holds a 4–0 lead over Hans Gildemeister in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Henrik Sundstrom leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henrik Sundstrom won the 1986 Indianapolis round of 32 3-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henrik Sundstrom | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | Hans Gildemeister | Match data | May 1, 1986* | R32 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 6-2 6-4 | Hans Gildemeister | Match data | Aug 21, 1985* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 2-6 0-6 7-5 6-3 6-4 | Hans Gildemeister | Match data | Jun 3, 1984* | R32 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 7-5 6-0 | Hans Gildemeister | Match data | Apr 13, 1984* | R16 | Nice | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henrik Sundstrom | #1,070 | #6 | 1 | 1,993 | 143 | 106 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Hans Gildemeister | — | — | — | 1,969 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henrik Sundstrom | Hans Gildemeister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #84 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #23 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #22 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #210 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #642 | 1,567 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Henrik Sundstrom | Hans Gildemeister | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 39 | 10 | 49 | 79.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1985 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 22 | 9 | 31 | 71.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 30 | 20 | 50 | 60.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 27 | 9 | 36 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 24 | 15 | 39 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| 25 | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 22 | 9 | 31 | 71.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 11 | 21 | 32 | 34.4% | 122 | 63 | 185 | 65.9% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% | — | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 174 | 116 | 290 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Henrik Sundstrom | Hans Gildemeister | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1981 | 1474 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 23.1% | -2.15 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 1602 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +68 | -105 | 56.7% | +0.63 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–3 (40%) | 103.9 | +2.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 1760 | 155.0 | — | — | — | — | -150 | +129 | -196 | 58.3% | +0.43 | 11–4 (73%) | 8–5 (62%) | 111.4 | -0.36 | 1975 | 1499 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.25 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1843 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | -184 | +159 | — | 66.1% | +0.85 | 9–8 (53%) | 13–4 (76%) | 102.9 | -0.43 | 1976 | 1515 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 55.6% | +0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.86 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1742 | 147.0 | — | — | — | — | -128 | +208 | — | 55.5% | +0.54 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.6 | -1.57 | 1977 | 1769 | 151.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | 57.5% | +0.62 | 11–3 (79%) | 4–8 (33%) | 105.7 | -0.25 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1711 | 139.4 | — | — | — | — | -166 | +152 | — | 50.0% | +0.04 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.1 | -1.61 | 1978 | 1776 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | 56.9% | +0.41 | 9–10 (47%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.5 | -2.21 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1619 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +83 | — | 35.4% | -1.23 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.3 | -1.64 | 1979 | 1943 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | -352 | +42 | — | 67.0% | +0.99 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.0 | -0.39 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1567 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -2.67 | — | — | — | +0.34 | 1980 | 1830 | 146.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | 59.2% | +0.47 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 94.4 | -0.61 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1554 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.05 | 1981 | 1853 | 147.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | 60.5% | +0.94 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–7 (36%) | 96.3 | +0.14 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1836 | 145.3 | — | — | — | — | -212 | +62 | — | 62.1% | +0.91 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.2 | -0.06 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1726 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | 42.9% | -0.69 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–0 | — | -0.23 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1743 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | 52.2% | +0.33 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.1 | -1.15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1642 | 116.1 | — | — | — | — | -77 | +53 | — | 39.5% | -1.02 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.3 | -0.07 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1551 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +73 | — | 20.0% | -2.16 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–2 | — | 0.00 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1533 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| Career | — | 1993 | 151.5 | — | — | — | — | -141 | +144 | -160 | 55.4% | +0.31 | 39–30 (57%) | 32–27 (54%) | 103.8 | -1.36 | — | 1969 | 151.8 | — | — | — | — | -223 | +35 | — | 56.1% | +0.40 | 55–46 (54%) | 29–37 (44%) | 94.0 | -1.30 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 13, 1985 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 5 | 3 | 8 | Jun 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Andres Gomez | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 25, 1986 | H2H |
| Alberto Tous | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jul 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Damir Keretic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 11, 1986 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Higueras | 4 | 5 | 9 | Aug 10, 1984 | — |
| Guillermo Vilas | 0 | 8 | 8 | Aug 14, 1982 | — |
| Victor Pecci | 4 | 3 | 7 | May 30, 1984 | — |
| Angel Gimenez | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 12, 1983 | — |
| Belus Prajoux | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 17, 1983 | — |