H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 0-1
Andrei Olhovskiy holds a 1–0 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1996 Shanghai fourth round 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1996* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Andrei Olhovskiy | 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |