H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Chris Woodruff H2H: 2-0
Hicham Arazi holds a 2–0 lead over Chris Woodruff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2001 US Open second round 6-4 7-6(1) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 6-4 7-6(1) 7-5 | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-3 6-4 7-6(3) | Chris Woodruff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Chris Woodruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |