H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Cyril Saulnier H2H: 1-0
Hicham Arazi holds a 1–0 lead over Cyril Saulnier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2004 Australian Open second round 3-6 6-1 6-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 3-6 6-1 6-2 (ret.) | Cyril Saulnier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cyril Saulnier | #1,013 | #48 | 798 | 1,800 | 75 | 111 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Cyril Saulnier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #130 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #86 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #90 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |