H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs David Rikl H2H: 0-1
David Rikl holds a 1–0 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Rikl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1996 US Open first round 6-4 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Rikl | 6-4 7-5 6-2 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |