H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Hicham Arazi vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 2-1

Hicham Arazi holds a 2–1 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2004 Eastbourne Open round of 16 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Jan-Michael Gambill
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hicham Arazi #35 7-6(3) 6-3 Jan-Michael Gambill #89 Match data Jun 18, 2004* R16 Eastbourne Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jan-Michael Gambill #29 6-3 7-5 Hicham Arazi #37 Match data Oct 20, 2000* R16 Toulouse ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Hicham Arazi #27 6-4 7-5 Jan-Michael Gambill #60 Match data Feb 24, 2000* R32 London ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 215 48.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jan-Michael Gambill #1,352 #14 1,655 1,949 201 191 51.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hicham Arazi Jan-Michael Gambill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
20 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0 1997 3–5 37.5% #186 1,520 0 0
21 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0 1998 31–23 57.4% #38 1,754 0 0
22 1996 12–17 41.4% #79 1,546 0 0 1999 25–25 50.0% #58 1,762 0 1
23 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1 2000 33–26 55.9% #33 1,818 0 1
24 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,715 0 1 2001 35–22 61.4% #21 1,759 0 2
25 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1 2002 28–26 51.9% #42 1,756 0 2
26 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1 2003 22–25 46.8% #51 1,643 0 3
27 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1 2004 18–25 41.9% #95 1,595 0 3
28 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1 2005 5–10 33.3% #191 1,558 0 3
29 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1 2006 1–1 50.0% #687 1,568 0 3
30 2004 15–18 45.5% #62 1,701 0 1 2007 0–2 0.0% #1107 1,504 0 3
31 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,664 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hicham Arazi Jan-Michael Gambill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 23 13 36 63.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1996 5 9 14 35.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 20 15 35 57.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 19 14 33 57.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 2000 20 17 37 54.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2001 29 13 42 69.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2000 17 15 32 53.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2003 20 17 37 54.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2004 15 18 33 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 2002 10 8 18 55.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 7 8 15 46.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 80 87 167 47.9% 77 84 161 47.8% 18 17 35 51.4% 27 27 54 50.0% — 160 126 286 55.9% 10 32 42 23.8% 23 21 44 52.3% 8 12 20 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 75/76 of Hicham Arazi's and 105/109 of Jan-Michael Gambill's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Hicham Arazi Jan-Michael Gambill
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 43/47 10.1 3.1 56.5% 75.0% 47.9% 60.7% 48.3% 63.4% 36.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 43/43 11.7 3.1 59.1% 76.0% 47.7% 57.9% 38.7% 64.3% 34.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 15/15 12.3 3.9 56.6% 76.7% 45.9% 58.6% 27.7% 63.3% 32.1%
29 2003 41/41 3.0 1.5 59.3% 69.4% 52.4% 58.2% 38.9% 62.5% 38.1% 2006 2/2 11.5 7.0 47.8% 73.2% 44.1% 59.7% 35.0% 57.0% 39.4%
30 2004 32/33 4.3 1.9 61.8% 67.8% 53.3% 59.6% 38.9% 62.3% 37.2% 2007 2/2 9.5 5.5 58.7% 79.4% 39.2% 37.5% 20.8% 62.8% 26.7%
31 2005 2/2 2.0 1.0 55.9% 59.0% 42.6% 50.6% 20.0% 51.4% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 75/417 3.5 1.7 60.3% 68.4% 52.5% 58.6% 38.4% 62.1% 37.4% — 105/392 11.1 3.4 57.5% 75.7% 47.3% 58.8% 40.7% 63.6% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hicham Arazi Jan-Michael Gambill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1487 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04
20 1994 1487 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.09 1997 1520 116.3 — — — — +18 — — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.59
21 1995 1457 106.7 — — — — +66 — — 29.4% -1.30 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.11 1998 1755 144.7 — — — — +27 -222 -139 53.4% +0.32 13–4 (76%) 11–12 (48%) 111.1 +0.72
22 1996 1546 121.8 — — — — +2 -25 +68 41.3% -0.65 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) 103.3 +0.69 1999 1763 145.0 — — — — +37 -263 -154 51.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 10–9 (53%) 102.4 -2.53
23 1997 1625 136.9 — — — — -45 +82 -20 50.4% -0.07 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 105.0 +0.56 2000 1819 143.8 — — — — -27 -296 -44 56.3% +0.60 10–10 (50%) 10–17 (37%) 96.8 -1.79
24 1998 1716 146.6 — — — — -39 +16 -91 49.6% 0.00 5–11 (31%) 6–10 (38%) 94.1 -3.26 2001 1759 150.9 — — — — +67 -256 -39 61.9% +0.81 8–6 (57%) 11–10 (52%) 99.4 +0.99
25 1999 1702 141.7 — — — — -21 +82 — 47.4% -0.41 9–5 (64%) 14–8 (64%) 107.1 -3.32 2002 1756 148.6 — — — — +48 -275 -49 51.9% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 11–14 (44%) 92.3 -0.54
26 2000 1775 143.8 — — — — +25 -55 -150 53.7% +0.23 12–7 (63%) 5–10 (33%) 103.1 +0.15 2003 1644 133.1 +0.95 -1.36 0.983 50.0% +72 -213 +27 48.2% +0.07 5–6 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 96.5 +1.55
27 2001 1834 144.1 — — — — +20 -121 -176 53.4% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 16–9 (64%) 106.4 -0.90 2004 1596 125.6 +0.40 -1.44 0.961 49.5% +33 -178 +70 44.1% -0.30 3–7 (30%) 13–11 (54%) 98.0 +1.48
28 2002 1700 126.9 — — — — +97 -76 — 46.7% -0.31 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 95.0 -0.75 2005 1559 116.9 -1.32 -3.12 0.876 47.9% +9 — — 33.3% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.5 +0.61
29 2003 1718 135.5 -0.40 +1.29 1.017 50.1% +50 -87 -83 51.0% +0.17 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 101.0 +0.03 2006 1569 105.0 -1.55 +1.41 0.916 48.6% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.02
30 2004 1702 135.1 -0.45 +0.35 0.986 49.8% +29 -110 +6 46.0% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 7–9 (44%) 95.1 -0.40 2007 1505 103.5 -0.27 -2.33 0.719 44.4% — — — 0.0% -1.75 — 0–1 — +0.01
31 2005 1665 97.8 -2.62 -3.75 0.527 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.02 2008 1506 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1508 103.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1865 143.4 -0.48 +0.75 0.987 49.7% +14 -4 -63 48.9% -0.15 65–63 (51%) 79–72 (52%) 104.2 -1.68 — 1949 145.6 +0.33 -1.61 0.952 49.4% +35 -250 -44 51.3% +0.24 62–56 (53%) 82–87 (49%) 100.1 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.