H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Leander Paes H2H: 2-0
Hicham Arazi holds a 2–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 1997 Doha third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 1997* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 6-2 6-3 | Leander Paes | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1996* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hicham Arazi | 6-4 7-6(5) | Leander Paes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |