Hicham Arazi
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 2 | 10 | 12 | Aug 5, 2004 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 26, 2004 | H2H |
| Max Mirnyi | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 3, 2004 | H2H |
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Mark Philippoussis | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 28, 2004 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Ota Fukarek H2H: 1-0
Hicham Arazi holds a 1–0 lead over Ota Fukarek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2001 Indianapolis round of 64 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Ota Fukarek | Match data | Aug 15, 2001* | R64 | Indianapolis | ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 215 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ota Fukarek | #1,497 | #101 | 414 | 1,515 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Ota Fukarek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #106 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #176 | 1,382 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Ota Fukarek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2001 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2002 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 80 | 87 | 167 | 47.9% | 77 | 84 | 161 | 47.8% | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 27 | 27 | 54 | 50.0% | — | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Ota Fukarek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1487 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1457 | 106.7 | — | — | — | — | +66 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.30 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 1546 | 121.8 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -25 | +68 | 41.3% | -0.65 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–7 (42%) | +0.69 | 1999 | 1482 | 97.9 | -2.77 | +1.99 | 0.990 | 49.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1625 | 136.9 | — | — | — | — | -45 | +82 | -20 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | +0.56 | 2000 | 1452 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 1716 | 146.6 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +16 | -91 | 49.6% | 0.00 | 5–11 (31%) | 6–10 (38%) | -3.26 | 2001 | 1483 | 105.3 | -1.24 | -0.73 | 0.946 | 48.6% | +49 | — | — | 25.0% | -0.92 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | +0.03 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1702 | 141.7 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +82 | — | 47.4% | -0.41 | 9–5 (64%) | 14–8 (64%) | -3.32 | 2002 | 1383 | 95.4 | -2.16 | -3.66 | 0.811 | 46.7% | +58 | — | — | 32.0% | -1.40 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | +0.81 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1775 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -55 | -150 | 53.7% | +0.23 | 12–7 (63%) | 5–10 (33%) | +0.15 | 2003 | 1385 | 92.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 1834 | 144.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -121 | -176 | 53.4% | -0.02 | 8–6 (57%) | 16–9 (64%) | -0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 1700 | 126.9 | — | — | — | — | +97 | -76 | — | 46.7% | -0.31 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–3 (57%) | -0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 1718 | 135.5 | -0.40 | +1.29 | 1.017 | 50.1% | +50 | -87 | -83 | 51.0% | +0.17 | 6–6 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 1702 | 135.1 | -0.45 | +0.35 | 0.986 | 49.8% | +29 | -110 | +6 | 46.0% | -0.25 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–9 (44%) | -0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1665 | 97.8 | -2.62 | -3.75 | 0.527 | 39.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1865 | 143.4 | -0.48 | +0.75 | 0.987 | 49.7% | +14 | -4 | -63 | 48.9% | -0.15 | 65–63 (51%) | 79–72 (52%) | -1.68 | — | 1516 | 97.0 | -1.92 | -2.32 | 0.865 | 47.5% | +54 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.20 | 0–7 (0%) | 3–5 (38%) | +7.60 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Ota Fukarek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lars Burgsmuller | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 2, 2002 | H2H |
| Mario Ancic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Fernando Vicente | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 18, 2002 | H2H |
| James Blake | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 12, 2002 | H2H |
| Edgardo Massa | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 11, 2002 | H2H |