H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Paradorn Srichaphan H2H: 1-1
Hicham Arazi and Paradorn Srichaphan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on carpet, while Paradorn Srichaphan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paradorn Srichaphan won the 2004 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2004* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Paradorn Srichaphan | 6-3 6-4 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2003* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Hicham Arazi | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Paradorn Srichaphan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Paradorn Srichaphan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |