Hicham Arazi
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 2 | 10 | 12 | Aug 5, 2004 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 26, 2004 | H2H |
| Max Mirnyi | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 3, 2004 | H2H |
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Mark Philippoussis | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 28, 2004 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 0-1
Paul Haarhuis holds a 1–0 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 128 7-6(4) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Haarhuis | 7-6(4) 6-3 6-2 | Hicham Arazi | Match data | Jun 23, 1999* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 215 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,887 | 251 | 247 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #25 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1989 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1998 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 25 | 1999 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1991 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 26 | 2000 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1992 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 27 | 2001 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1993 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 28 | 2002 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1994 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% |
| 29 | 2003 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1995 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 30 | 2004 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1996 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 80 | 87 | 167 | 47.9% | 77 | 84 | 161 | 47.8% | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 27 | 27 | 54 | 50.0% | — | 111 | 98 | 209 | 53.1% | 56 | 70 | 126 | 44.4% | 28 | 25 | 53 | 52.8% | 56 | 54 | 110 | 50.9% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 75/76 of Hicham Arazi's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 44/50 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 58.4% | 68.3% | 52.1% | 45.9% | 48.3% | 61.5% | 40.2% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 55/62 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 59.8% | 70.2% | 51.8% | 63.1% | 41.7% | 62.7% | 38.0% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 51/56 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 59.5% | 69.2% | 52.2% | 60.9% | 43.4% | 62.2% | 38.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 43/48 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 59.7% | 68.8% | 50.0% | 64.0% | 48.8% | 61.1% | 37.1% |
| 29 | 2003 | 41/41 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 59.3% | 69.4% | 52.4% | 58.2% | 38.9% | 62.5% | 38.1% | 1995 | 55/57 | 4.6 | 2.6 | 59.8% | 68.3% | 50.7% | 54.3% | 40.4% | 61.0% | 36.3% |
| 30 | 2004 | 32/33 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 61.8% | 67.8% | 53.3% | 59.6% | 38.9% | 62.3% | 37.2% | 1996 | 48/58 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 62.5% | 68.2% | 51.8% | 50.8% | 44.9% | 62.2% | 35.8% |
| 31 | 2005 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 55.9% | 59.0% | 42.6% | 50.6% | 20.0% | 51.4% | 25.6% | 1997 | 37/44 | 5.3 | 2.8 | 59.7% | 71.9% | 51.2% | 59.4% | 46.1% | 63.5% | 37.4% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 30/40 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 56.4% | 71.4% | 50.5% | 60.7% | 45.0% | 62.5% | 36.0% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 17/21 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 61.5% | 68.9% | 48.6% | 61.8% | 29.9% | 61.0% | 36.2% |
| Career | — | 75/417 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 60.3% | 68.4% | 52.5% | 58.6% | 38.4% | 62.1% | 37.4% | — | 380/498 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 59.7% | 69.4% | 51.2% | 57.5% | 43.9% | 62.0% | 37.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1487 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1457 | 106.7 | — | — | — | — | +66 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.30 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.1 | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 1546 | 121.8 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -25 | +68 | 41.3% | -0.65 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–7 (42%) | 103.3 | +0.69 | 1988 | 1489 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1625 | 136.9 | — | — | — | — | -45 | +82 | -20 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | 105.0 | +0.56 | 1989 | 1636 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | -19 | -43 | — | 54.3% | +0.30 | 1–2 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 101.8 | +0.52 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1716 | 146.6 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +16 | -91 | 49.6% | 0.00 | 5–11 (31%) | 6–10 (38%) | 94.1 | -3.26 | 1990 | 1670 | 140.9 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -37 | -64 | 46.9% | -0.14 | 6–8 (43%) | 9–12 (43%) | 100.3 | -1.33 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1702 | 141.7 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +82 | — | 47.4% | -0.41 | 9–5 (64%) | 14–8 (64%) | 107.1 | -3.32 | 1991 | 1730 | 144.8 | +0.85 | +1.66 | 1.042 | 50.8% | +15 | -61 | -171 | 51.1% | +0.31 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–5 (55%) | 102.5 | -2.70 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1775 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -55 | -150 | 53.7% | +0.23 | 12–7 (63%) | 5–10 (33%) | 103.1 | +0.15 | 1992 | 1685 | 143.9 | +1.01 | +0.37 | 1.019 | 50.2% | +33 | -24 | — | 50.3% | +0.07 | 9–8 (53%) | 12–15 (44%) | 99.9 | -0.46 |
| 27 | 2001 | 1834 | 144.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -121 | -176 | 53.4% | -0.02 | 8–6 (57%) | 16–9 (64%) | 106.4 | -0.90 | 1993 | 1764 | 141.2 | +1.06 | +0.08 | 1.010 | 50.5% | -19 | +4 | -232 | 53.5% | +0.17 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.1 | -0.40 |
| 28 | 2002 | 1700 | 126.9 | — | — | — | — | +97 | -76 | — | 46.7% | -0.31 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–3 (57%) | 95.0 | -0.75 | 1994 | 1715 | 147.9 | +0.13 | -0.29 | 0.953 | 49.4% | +46 | +62 | — | 50.8% | -0.08 | 10–4 (71%) | 8–9 (47%) | 104.6 | -1.32 |
| 29 | 2003 | 1718 | 135.5 | -0.40 | +1.29 | 1.017 | 50.1% | +50 | -87 | -83 | 51.0% | +0.17 | 6–6 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | 101.0 | +0.03 | 1995 | 1716 | 137.5 | -0.59 | -0.36 | 0.931 | 48.7% | +46 | -19 | -93 | 50.0% | -0.17 | 18–5 (78%) | 11–12 (48%) | 106.7 | +0.15 |
| 30 | 2004 | 1702 | 135.1 | -0.45 | +0.35 | 0.986 | 49.8% | +29 | -110 | +6 | 46.0% | -0.25 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–9 (44%) | 95.1 | -0.40 | 1996 | 1736 | 139.0 | +0.20 | -0.84 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +10 | -47 | -15 | 46.6% | -0.19 | 12–5 (71%) | 13–16 (45%) | 105.2 | +0.88 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1665 | 97.8 | -2.62 | -3.75 | 0.527 | 39.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1997 | 1675 | 138.9 | +1.41 | -0.41 | 1.025 | 50.4% | -16 | -7 | +99 | 48.7% | +0.13 | 5–13 (28%) | 14–12 (54%) | 93.4 | -0.68 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1660 | 132.7 | +0.38 | -1.61 | 0.960 | 49.6% | +19 | -37 | +79 | 48.4% | +0.07 | 8–5 (62%) | 6–7 (46%) | 103.3 | +1.10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1620 | 127.7 | -0.68 | -0.73 | 0.928 | 48.6% | +35 | -73 | +103 | 42.4% | -0.44 | 0–6 (0%) | 2–7 (22%) | 89.4 | -1.04 |
| Career | — | 1865 | 143.4 | -0.48 | +0.75 | 0.987 | 49.7% | +14 | -4 | -63 | 48.9% | -0.15 | 65–63 (51%) | 79–72 (52%) | 104.2 | -1.68 | — | 1888 | 146.0 | +0.48 | -0.13 | 0.982 | 49.8% | +17 | -22 | -15 | 49.4% | 0.00 | 84–71 (54%) | 97–108 (47%) | 102.8 | -1.05 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Paul Haarhuis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | 7 | 5 | 12 | Jun 27, 1999 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 1 | 8 | 9 | Oct 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 19, 1997 | H2H |