H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 0-1
Paul Haarhuis holds a 1–0 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1999 Wimbledon first round 7-6(4) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Paul Haarhuis | 7-6(4) 6-3 6-2 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |