H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 0-1
Renzo Furlan holds a 1–0 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Renzo Furlan won the 1999 Barcelona second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1999* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 6-3 6-4 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Renzo Furlan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |