H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-2
Hicham Arazi and Vincent Spadea are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2004 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-7(3) 7-5 5-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 6-7(3) 7-5 5-3 (ret.) | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| May 6, 2004* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1997* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Hicham Arazi | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1996* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-3 6-1 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hicham Arazi | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |