H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Holger Rune vs Andrey Rublev H2H: 1-2
Andrey Rublev holds a 2–1 lead over Holger Rune in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2023 Monte Carlo Masters final 5-7 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Denmark
Age 23
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2023* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Clay | Andrey Rublev | 5-7 6-2 7-5 | Holger Rune | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2023* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 3-6 6-3 4-6 7-6(9) | Holger Rune | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2022* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Holger Rune | 6-4 7-5 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Rune | #81 | #4 | 4,825 | 2,119 | 170 | 100 | 63.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Holger Rune | Andrey Rublev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #103 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #11 | 2,078 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2023 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 1,967 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2024 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2025 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 |