H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Holger Rune vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 2-0
Holger Rune holds a 2–0 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Holger Rune leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Holger Rune won the 2023 Rome Masters third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Denmark
Age 23
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2023* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Holger Rune | 6-4 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2022* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Holger Rune | 6-3 7-5 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Rune | #81 | #4 | 4,825 | 2,119 | 170 | 100 | 63.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Holger Rune | Fabio Fognini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #103 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #11 | 2,078 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 1,967 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 |