H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Holger Rune vs Radu Albot H2H: 1-1
Holger Rune and Radu Albot are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Radu Albot won the 2021 Umag third round 1-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Denmark
Age 23
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2022* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Holger Rune | 6-2 6-3 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2021* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Radu Albot | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Holger Rune | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2021* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Holger Rune | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Radu Albot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Rune | #81 | #4 | 4,825 | 2,119 | 170 | 100 | 63.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Holger Rune | Radu Albot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #103 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #11 | 2,078 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 1,967 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |