H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 1-0
Horacio de la Pena holds a 1–0 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1989 Gstaad third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1989* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 7-6 6-4 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Amos Mansdorf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |