H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs D. Rostagno H2H: 2-0
Horacio de la Pena holds a 2–0 lead over D. Rostagno in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio de la Pena leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1993 Charlotte quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1993* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-2 6-3 | D. Rostagno | Match data |
| May 13, 1987* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-3 6-3 | D. Rostagno | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| D. Rostagno | #1,316 | #13 | 1,392 | 1,920 | 192 | 180 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | D. Rostagno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #418 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #428 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #89 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #111 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #486 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |