H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Damir Keretic H2H: 1-0
Horacio de la Pena holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1987 Barcelona second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1987* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 7-5 6-3 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |