H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Francisco Maciel H2H: 2-0
Horacio de la Pena holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Maciel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio de la Pena leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1990 Kitzbuhel second round 6-2 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 62
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1990* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Francisco Maciel | Match data |
| May 8, 1985* | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-3 6-4 | Francisco Maciel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Francisco Maciel | #873 | #35 | 130 | 1,680 | 33 | 43 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Francisco Maciel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #271 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #353 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |