H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Horacio de la Pena vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 1-0

Horacio de la Pena holds a 1–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1989 ASB Classic round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Horacio de la Pena
ARG Age 60 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horacio de la Pena #50 6-3 3-6 6-2 Gianluca Pozzi #181 Match data Jan 12, 1989* R32 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Horacio de la Pena #846 #31 679 1,833 185 173 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horacio de la Pena Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 4–4 50.0% #89 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 23–17 57.5% #70 1,689 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1986 33–21 61.1% #38 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1987 17–19 47.2% #88 1,643 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1988 27–17 61.4% #52 1,737 0 1 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1989 15–17 46.9% #128 1,651 0 2 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 1990 20–14 58.8% #63 1,724 0 3 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 1991 16–18 47.1% #101 1,721 0 3 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0
25 1992 7–18 28.0% #114 1,551 0 3 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0
26 1993 17–16 51.5% #79 1,594 0 4 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 1994 6–12 33.3% #265 1,555 0 4 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Horacio de la Pena Gianluca Pozzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 5 3 8 62.5% 18 14 32 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 0 5 5 0.0% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 19 9 28 67.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 0 3 3 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 7 16 23 30.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1993 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1994 — — — — 6 12 18 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 24 34 58 41.4% 159 129 288 55.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Horacio de la Pena Gianluca Pozzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1548 126.7 — — — — — +36 — 47.6% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1690 129.7 — — — — -65 -50 — 53.6% -0.07 6–5 (55%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 1734 143.7 — — — — -95 +41 — 58.3% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 1643 127.6 — — — — -87 +98 — 47.2% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 1737 136.6 — — — — -122 +90 — 56.6% +0.42 10–5 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.19 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06
22 1989 1651 127.5 — — — — -43 +105 — 48.2% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.13 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04
23 1990 1725 133.8 — — — — -197 +118 — 59.5% +0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.57 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
24 1991 1722 138.0 — — — — -245 +79 — 50.7% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.62 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01
25 1992 1552 118.2 — — — — — +61 — 36.5% -1.29 1–8 (11%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74
26 1993 1595 127.5 — — — — — +37 — 52.7% +0.27 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.20 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.02
27 1994 1556 113.8 — — — — — +6 — 41.0% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.33 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.05
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — -1.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.16
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1833 138.3 — — — — -105 +55 — 51.7% +0.12 53–56 (49%) 52–47 (53%) 98.5 +1.08 — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.