H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Glenn Layendecker H2H: 0-1
Glenn Layendecker holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Glenn Layendecker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Glenn Layendecker won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Glenn Layendecker | 6-3 7-6 6-0 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Glenn Layendecker | #804 | #48 | 447 | 1,733 | 77 | 104 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Glenn Layendecker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #118 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #353 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #87 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #134 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #135 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |