H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Hans Schwaier H2H: 2-1
Horacio de la Pena holds a 2–1 lead over Hans Schwaier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1986 US Open first round 7-6 6-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Horacio de la Pena | 7-6 6-7 6-3 6-3 | Hans Schwaier | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1986* | Bari | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 5-7 6-2 6-2 | Hans Schwaier | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1985* | Bari | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Hans Schwaier | 7-5 6-4 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Hans Schwaier | #528 | #38 | 92 | 1,748 | 57 | 84 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Hans Schwaier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #434 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #47 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #158 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #170 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #212 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |