H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Horacio de la Pena vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-0

Horacio de la Pena holds a 2–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio de la Pena leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1994 Florence round of 16 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Horacio de la Pena
ARG Age 60 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horacio de la Pena #167 3-6 6-3 6-2 Jeff Tarango #91 Match data Jun 10, 1994* R16 Florence ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Horacio de la Pena #140 7-6(5) 6-1 Jeff Tarango #69 Match data Apr 15, 1993* R32 Charlotte ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Horacio de la Pena #846 #31 679 1,833 185 173 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horacio de la Pena Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 4–4 50.0% #89 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 23–17 57.5% #70 1,689 0 1 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1986 33–21 61.1% #38 1,734 0 1 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1987 17–19 47.2% #88 1,643 0 1 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1988 27–17 61.4% #52 1,737 0 1 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1989 15–17 46.9% #128 1,651 0 2 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1990 20–14 58.8% #63 1,724 0 3 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1991 16–18 47.1% #101 1,721 0 3 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1992 7–18 28.0% #114 1,551 0 3 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1993 17–16 51.5% #79 1,594 0 4 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1994 6–12 33.3% #265 1,555 0 4 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Horacio de la Pena Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 5 3 8 62.5% 18 14 32 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1987 0 5 5 0.0% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — — 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 19 9 28 67.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1991 0 3 3 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 7 16 23 30.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1993 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1994 — — — — 6 12 18 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 34 58 41.4% 159 129 288 55.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Horacio de la Pena Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1548 126.7 — — — — — +36 — 47.6% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1690 129.7 — — — — -65 -50 — 53.6% -0.07 6–5 (55%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.63 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1986 1734 143.7 — — — — -95 +41 — 58.3% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.16 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1987 1643 127.6 — — — — -87 +98 — 47.2% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.41 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1988 1737 136.6 — — — — -122 +90 — 56.6% +0.42 10–5 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.19 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1989 1651 127.5 — — — — -43 +105 — 48.2% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.13 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1990 1725 133.8 — — — — -197 +118 — 59.5% +0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.57 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1991 1722 138.0 — — — — -245 +79 — 50.7% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.62 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1992 1552 118.2 — — — — — +61 — 36.5% -1.29 1–8 (11%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1993 1595 127.5 — — — — — +37 — 52.7% +0.27 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.20 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 1994 1556 113.8 — — — — — +6 — 41.0% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.33 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1833 138.3 — — — — -105 +55 — 51.7% +0.12 53–56 (49%) 52–47 (53%) 98.5 +1.08 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.