H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Jim Pugh H2H: 1-0
Horacio de la Pena holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Pugh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1988 Indian Wells second round 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1988* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Horacio de la Pena | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Jim Pugh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,832 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Jim Pugh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |