H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Libor Pimek H2H: 1-1
Horacio de la Pena and Libor Pimek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-1 6-4 7-6 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1985* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Libor Pimek | 6-7 6-2 6-4 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |