H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Marian Vajda H2H: 1-1
Horacio de la Pena and Marian Vajda are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marian Vajda leads 1–0 on clay, while Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marian Vajda won the 1986 Nice fourth round 7-5 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 61
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1986* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marian Vajda | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1985* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Horacio de la Pena | 6-2 6-1 | Marian Vajda | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marian Vajda | #1,076 | #34 | 556 | 1,784 | 120 | 149 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Marian Vajda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #52 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #88 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #72 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #123 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #83 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #97 | 1,598 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,503 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,456 | 0 | 2 |