H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Mark Koevermans H2H: 2-1
Horacio de la Pena holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Koevermans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Horacio de la Pena leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Mark Koevermans won the 1992 Barcelona second round 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1992* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Mark Koevermans | 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| May 18, 1990* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 7-6 6-3 | Mark Koevermans | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1988* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-7 6-4 7-6 | Mark Koevermans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mark Koevermans | #753 | #37 | 712 | 1,777 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Mark Koevermans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #63 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #71 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #139 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #412 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |