H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 2-0
Horacio de la Pena holds a 2–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio de la Pena leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1990 Florence third round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1990* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 7-6 6-1 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1987* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-0 6-2 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Martin Wostenholme | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |