H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Massimo Cierro H2H: 2-0
Horacio de la Pena holds a 2–0 lead over Massimo Cierro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio de la Pena leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1991 Rome Masters third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1991* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 7-5 6-1 | Massimo Cierro | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1988* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 5-7 6-1 7-5 | Massimo Cierro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Massimo Cierro | #1,295 | #113 | 295 | 1,535 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Massimo Cierro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #202 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #220 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |