H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Horacio de la Pena vs Mats Wilander H2H: 1-1

Horacio de la Pena and Mats Wilander are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on clay, while Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1988 Boston quarterfinal 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Horacio de la Pena
ARG Age 59 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 9, 1988* Boston ATP 250 QF Clay Horacio de la Pena #126 7-6 6-1 Mats Wilander #3 Match data
Aug 23, 1986* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mats Wilander #2 6-3 6-2 Horacio de la Pena #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Horacio de la Pena #846 #31 679 1,832 185 173 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horacio de la Pena Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 1984 4–4 50.0% #89 1,548 0 0 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 1985 23–17 57.5% #70 1,689 0 1 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1986 33–21 61.1% #38 1,733 0 1 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1987 17–19 47.2% #88 1,642 0 1 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1988 27–17 61.4% #52 1,735 0 1 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1989 15–17 46.9% #128 1,651 0 2 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1990 20–14 58.8% #63 1,724 0 3 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1991 16–18 47.1% #101 1,720 0 3 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1992 7–18 28.0% #114 1,552 0 3 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1993 17–16 51.5% #79 1,595 0 4 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1994 6–12 33.3% #265 1,555 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 — — — — — — — 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 — — — — — — — 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 — — — — — — — 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33