H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 0-1
Nicklas Kulti holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1990 Prague semifinal 6-3 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1990* | Prague | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Nicklas Kulti | 6-3 1-0 (ret.) | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |