H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 0-1
Paul Haarhuis holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1992 Genova third round 6-2 1-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1992* | Genova | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paul Haarhuis | 6-2 1-6 6-0 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |