H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Horacio de la Pena vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 0-1

Paul Haarhuis holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1992 Genova round of 32 6-2 1-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Horacio de la Pena
ARG Age 60 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Haarhuis #35 6-2 1-6 6-0 Horacio de la Pena #119 Match data Jun 18, 1992* R32 Genova ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Horacio de la Pena #846 #31 679 1,833 185 173 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horacio de la Pena Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1984 4–4 50.0% #89 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 23–17 57.5% #70 1,689 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1986 33–21 61.1% #38 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1987 17–19 47.2% #88 1,643 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1988 27–17 61.4% #52 1,737 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1989 15–17 46.9% #128 1,651 0 2 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1990 20–14 58.8% #63 1,724 0 3 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 1991 16–18 47.1% #101 1,721 0 3 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0
25 1992 7–18 28.0% #114 1,551 0 3 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0
26 1993 17–16 51.5% #79 1,594 0 4 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0
27 1994 6–12 33.3% #265 1,555 0 4 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Horacio de la Pena Paul Haarhuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1984 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 5 3 8 62.5% 18 14 32 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 0 5 5 0.0% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 19 9 28 67.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 0 3 3 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 7 16 23 30.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1993 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
27 1994 — — — — 6 12 18 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 24 34 58 41.4% 159 129 288 55.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Horacio de la Pena Paul Haarhuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1984 1548 126.7 — — — — — +36 — 47.6% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1690 129.7 — — — — -65 -50 — 53.6% -0.07 6–5 (55%) 8–3 (73%) 105.5 +1.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 1734 143.7 — — — — -95 +41 — 58.3% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 7–6 (54%) 101.7 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 1643 127.6 — — — — -87 +98 — 47.2% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 99.2 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 1737 136.6 — — — — -122 +90 — 56.6% +0.42 10–5 (67%) 11–6 (65%) 106.5 +1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1989 1651 127.5 — — — — -43 +105 — 48.2% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 3–7 (30%) 95.1 +0.13 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
23 1990 1725 133.8 — — — — -197 +118 — 59.5% +0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) 98.7 +0.57 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.8 +0.52
24 1991 1722 138.0 — — — — -245 +79 — 50.7% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.62 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 100.3 -1.33
25 1992 1552 118.2 — — — — — +61 — 36.5% -1.29 1–8 (11%) 3–1 (75%) 94.2 -0.09 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -2.69
26 1993 1595 127.5 — — — — — +37 — 52.7% +0.27 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 98.2 +1.20 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) 99.9 -0.46
27 1994 1556 113.8 — — — — — +6 — 41.0% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.33 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -0.40
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) 104.6 -1.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) 106.7 +0.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) 105.2 +0.88
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) 93.4 -0.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 103.3 +1.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 89.4 -1.04
Career — 1833 138.3 — — — — -105 +55 — 51.7% +0.12 53–56 (49%) 52–47 (53%) 98.5 +1.08 — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.