H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Todd Witsken H2H: 1-1
Horacio de la Pena and Todd Witsken are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Witsken leads 1–0 on carpet, while Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1993 Mexico City third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1993* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 7-5 6-2 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1989* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Todd Witsken | 7-6 6-1 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Todd Witsken | #1,205 | #43 | 568 | 1,780 | 115 | 135 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Todd Witsken | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #55 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #158 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #275 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |