H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 0-1
Todd Woodbridge holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1993 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-7(9) RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Todd Woodbridge | 6-2 6-7(9) (ret.) | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |