H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Horacio Zeballos vs Maximo Gonzalez H2H: 0-1
Maximo Gonzalez holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maximo Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maximo Gonzalez won the 2010 New Haven second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2011 | Acapulco | ATP 500 | Q2 | Clay | Maximo Gonzalez | 6-3 6-1 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2010* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Maximo Gonzalez | 6-3 6-4 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maximo Gonzalez | #467 | #58 | 992 | 1,702 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio Zeballos | Maximo Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #132 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #66 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #150 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #392 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |